The Abolition of Administrative Court Authority over Positive Fictitious Decisions Following Indonesia's Job Creation Reform

Authors

Abstract

This study examined the abolition of the Administrative Court's authority over positive fictitious decisions following Indonesia's Job Creation Law reform and its implications for contemporary administrative governance. The reform fundamentally transformed the administrative justice system by integrating business licensing into a risk-based digital governance framework, raising concerns regarding legal certainty, judicial oversight, and the protection of citizens' rights. The study aimed to analyze the legal consequences of this institutional change, explain the evolving relationship between administrative governance and judicial control, and formulate an adaptive model of administrative oversight. A qualitative library research design employing a meta-synthesis approach was applied. The study synthesized evidence from eighty qualitative studies published between 2018 and 2025. Data were collected through systematic digital documentation following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol and analyzed using content, thematic, descriptive, comparative, and narrative synthesis techniques. The findings revealed that digital administrative reform improved bureaucratic efficiency but did not fully replace the preventive legal protection previously provided by positive fictitious decisions. The study proposed an adaptive administrative oversight model integrating legal certainty, governmental accountability, judicial supervision, and the protection of citizens' rights within Indonesia's contemporary digital administrative governance framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., Hartono, J., & Kosuma, I. P. (2023). Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020. Arena Hukum, 16(3), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.5

Almahdali, H., Qomariyah, E., Paselle, E., Fadri, Z., Pradana, I. P. Y. B., Rustan, F. R., Yuherman, Y., Hartoyo, H., & Suyatno, S. (2024). Reformasi Birokrasi Dalam Administrasi Publik: Tantangan Dan Peluang Di Era Digital. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Andi, A. (2021). BIAS KEWENANGAN FIKTIF POSITIF PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM RANAH PERIZINAN PASCA TERBITNYA UNDANG UNDANG CIPTA KERJA. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 6(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v6i2.6323

Arifin, F., & Ramdhani, Y. A. H. D. (2025). KEKOSONGAN HUKUM DALAM PENETAPAN KEPUTUSAN FIKTIF POSITIF: STUDI KASUS DPRKPP KOTA SURABAYA. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(11). https://doi.org/10.62281/v9f8ea81

Aritonang, S. I., & Erliyana, A. (2023). Discretionary Authority of Government Officials After Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in the Perspective of Government Administration: (Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020): Kewenangan Diskresi Pejabat Pemerintah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Pemerintahan: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora), 7(1), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v7i2.1881

Badawi, A., & Wedhatami, B. (2025). Implementasi Online Single Submission Sebagai Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Perizinan Untuk Meningkatkan Peluang Perizinan Berusaha Dan Investasi. Bookchapter Hukum Dan Lingkungan, 1, 22–49.

Devita, R. G., Widjajanti, K., & Wardoyo, P. (2024). Strategi peningkatan layanan perizinan melalui online single submission risk-based approach (oss rba) di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 17(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.26623/jreb.v17i1.7938

Jackson, N. E. (2025). Digitizing Licensing Services with OSS-RBA: E-Government Implementation in Southwest Papua. 965–973. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-791-5_94

Jaelani, A. Q. J. (2017). Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mengadili Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Negatif dan Fiktif Positif. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v6i2.2019

Kencanawati, K., Widiarty, W. S., & Nadapdap, B. (2025). Pengaruh Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Terhadap Struktur Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 5(6), 1793–1811. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i6.32162

Lindseth, P. (2019). Judicial Review in Administrative Governance: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative Analysis. Dalam J. de Poorter, E. Hirsch Ballin, & S. Lavrijssen (Ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State (hlm. 175–194). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-307-8_9

Marbun, E. (2023). MENGKAJI KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTASI DI INDONESIA MELALUI LEMBAGA PERIZINAN ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION (OSS). "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(3). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss3/16

Maridjo, M. (2022). KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PASCA TERBITNYA UNDANG-UNDANG Nomor 30 TAHUN 2014. Jurnal JURISTIC, 3(01), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v3i01.2984

Mayasari, D. N. (2025a). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pelaku Bisnis Dalam Memperoleh Izin Berusaha Melalui Lembaga Perizinan Online Single Submission (OSS). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3). https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/1631

Mayasari, D. N. (2025b). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pelaku Bisnis Dalam Memperoleh Izin Berusaha Melalui Lembaga Perizinan Online Single Submission (OSS). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3). https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/1631

Ngurah Wairocana, I. G., Siki Layang, I. W. B., Sudiarta, K., Hariestha Martana, P. A., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Hermanto, B. (2021). KENDALA DAN CARA HAKIM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PASCA UU ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN: SUATU PENDEKATAN ATAS PENANGANAN PERKARA FIKTIF POSITIF. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3), 563. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2755

Rachman, S. N., & Tunggati, M. T. (2025). MEKANISME PERIZINAN USAHA PANGAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA. Jurnal Administrasi, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Ilmu Sosial (JAEIS), 4(3), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.37606/jaeis.v4i3.369

Ranchordás, S. (2024). The Invisible Citizen in the Digital State: Administrative Law Meets Digital Constitutionalism. Dalam C. van Oirsouw, J. de Poorter, I. Leijten, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, & M. De Visser (Ed.), European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2023: Constitutional Law in the Digital Era (hlm. 15–40). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-647-5_2

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2022). Democracy and Executive Power: Administrative Policymaking in Comparative Perspective. Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y Método, 6, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.37417/RPD/vol_6_2022_978

Sarjito, A. (2025). THE DOMINO EFFECT OF OSS-RBA: WHEN A SINGLE PLATFORM DETERMINES THE FUTURE OF THOUSANDS OF MSMEs. Irpia : Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Dan Pengembangan, 10(4), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.71040/irpia.v10i4.281

Susetiyo, W., & Iftitah, A. (2021). Peranan dan Tanggungjawab Pemerintah dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Pasca Berlakunya UU Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Supremasi, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v11i2.1648

Toyi, A. R., & Hamidun, E. Z. P. (2025). Establishing Legal Certainty in the Digital Era: Challenges and Solutions. Estudiante Law Journal, 7(2), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31630

Utomo, B. S., Kurniawan, S. A., & Nugraha, R. A. (2025). Analisis Efektivitas OSS-RBA dalam Penyederhanaan Proses Perizinan Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik Untuk Kepentingan Sendiri. Knowledge on Sustainability, Longevity, and Interdisciplinary, 1(1), 15–28.

UU No. 6 Tahun 2023. (t.t.). Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. Diambil 10 Juli 2026, dari http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/246523/uu-no-6-tahun-2023

Wandhani, K. T. N., Pasaribu, A. V., Ariani, A. N., & Santini, P. A. W. (2024). ANALISIS DINAMIKA HUKUM TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN FIKTIF NEGATIF DAN POSITIF DALAM ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpss.v5i1.5364

Wardani, M., Kamaluddin, K., Hidayatullah, A., & Haeril, H. (2024). Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Online Single Submission Dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Layanan Perizinan di Kota Bima. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 4(3), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v4i3.538

Wicaksono, D. A., Hantoro, B. F., & Kurniawan, D. (2021). QUO VADIS PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PENERIMAAN PERMOHONAN FIKTIF POSITIF PASCA PENATAAN REGULASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 10(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.715

Wicaksono, R. M. T. A. D. (2021). Tinjauan Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, dan Kemanfaatan dalam Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelayanan Berusaha Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Supremasi, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v11i2.1278

Wulandari, D. (2020). Pengujian Keputusan Fiktif Positif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Lex Renaissance, 5(1), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art3

Wulandari, R. (2021). IMPLIKASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN TERHADAP UPAYA HUKUM LUAR BIASA DALAM SENGKETA PERTANAHAN. "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss2/35

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

The Abolition of Administrative Court Authority over Positive Fictitious Decisions Following Indonesia’s Job Creation Reform. (2026). Lexa: Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 22-42. https://journal.ardiakademika.com/index.php/lexa/article/view/20