A Justice Oriented Time-Based Positive Fictitious Mechanism under Government Regulation No. 28 of 2025
Keywords:
positive fictitious decision, legal certainty, risk-based business licensing, digital governance, administrative lawAbstract
This study examined the implementation of the time-based positive fictitious mechanism introduced under Government Regulation No. 28 of 2025 as part of Indonesia’s business licensing reform. The regulatory change raised important issues concerning legal certainty, administrative justice, digital governance, and the effectiveness of public service delivery. The research aimed to analyze the legal construction of the time-based positive fictitious mechanism, identify key conceptual themes in the literature, and formulate a justice-oriented conceptual model. A qualitative library research design employing the meta-ethnography approach was used to synthesize findings from sixty scholarly articles published between 2017 and 2025 and retrieved from reputable international and national academic databases. The findings demonstrated that the effectiveness of the mechanism depended on regulatory harmonization, legal certainty, transparent digital governance, limitations on administrative discretion, and adequate protection of citizens' rights. The study proposed a conceptual framework for a justice-oriented time-based positive fictitious mechanism, contributing to the development of administrative law theory while providing practical guidance for strengthening business licensing reform and improving the quality, transparency, and accountability of public services in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Alvin Nashir, M. A. N. (2024). Pudarnya Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sengketa Perizinan atas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law). TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 2(01), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i01.178
Analisis Penerapan OSS Berbasis Risiko dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia | JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA. (t.t.).https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.co.id/index.php/jinu/article/view/4556
Arsalan, H. (2020). Prinsip Administrative Justice Procedure Dalam Penataan Mekanisme Perizinan Usaha Wajib Amdal Di Indonesia [Thesis, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA]. http://www.lib.unair.ac.id
Badawi, A., & Wedhatami, B. (2025). Implementasi Online Single Submission Sebagai Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Perizinan Untuk Meningkatkan Peluang Perizinan Berusaha Dan Investasi. Bookchapter Hukum Dan Lingkungan, 1, 22–49.
Digital government and administrative law: Between bureaucracy, trust and innovation - ProQuest. (t.t.).https://www.proquest.com/openview/e56004ad83cda29e5db56af572f7b7d9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2040925
Discretionary Authority of Government Officials After Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in the Perspective of Government Administration: (Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020): Kewenangan Diskresi Pejabat Pemerintah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Pemerintahan: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 | Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora). (t.t.).https://ejournal.unibabwi.ac.id/index.php/santhet/article/view/1881
Fiqri, I. N., Frinaldi, A., & Roberia. (2025). Integrasi Prinsip Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Transformasi Digital Governance untuk Pelayanan Publik Akuntabel dan Transparan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(3), 334-346.
From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control Bovens 2002 Public Administration Review Wiley Online Library. (t.t.).https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0033-3352.00168
Hardiansyah, M. A., Sumarja, F. X., Ridlwan, Z., Sunaryo, S., & Budiyono, B. (2025). Prinsip Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penentuan Tingkat Risiko Usaha Dan Pemberian Sanksi Administratif di Provinsi Lampung. Viva Themis : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.24967/vt.v8i2.4409
Hr, R., Heryansyah, D., & Pratiwi, D. K. (2018). Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art7
Jackson, N. E. (2025). Digitizing Licensing Services with OSS-RBA: E-Government Implementation in Southwest Papua. 965-973. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-791-5_94
Kencanawati, K., Widiarty, W. S., & Nadapdap, B. (2025). Pengaruh Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Terhadap Struktur Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 5(6), 1793–1811. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i6.32162
Marbun, E. (2023). MENGKAJI KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTASI DI INDONESIA MELALUI LEMBAGA PERIZINAN ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION (OSS). "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(3). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss3/16
Mayasari, D. N. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pelaku Bisnis Dalam Memperoleh Izin Berusaha Melalui Lembaga Perizinan Online Single Submission (OSS). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3). https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/1631
MEKANISME PERIZINAN USAHA PANGAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA | Jurnal Administrasi, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dan Ilmu Sosial (JAEIS). (t.t.). https://e-journal.unbitago.ac.id/home/index.php/JAEIS/article/view/369
Nurhayati, N., Rustyono, G. F., Farid, A. M., & Suryadi, R. (2025). Legal Certainty of The Positive Fictive Policy In Business Licensing Through The Online Single Submission Risk-Based Approach System In Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i2.12009
Penggunaan Sarana Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Menyikapi Ketidakpastian Penerapan Norma Keputusan Fiktif Positif | Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara. (t.t.). https://proceedingaphtnhan.id/index.php/paphtnhan/article/view/86
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Mengenai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Permohonan Fiktif Positif Pada Putusan No. 3/P/FP/2020/PTUN.MKS | UNES Law Review. (t.t.). Diambil 10 Juli 2026, dari https://www.review-unes.com/law/article/view/1915
PP No. 28 Tahun 2025. (t.t.). Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. Diambil 10 Juli 2026, dari http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/319773/pp-no-28-tahun-2025
Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 | Arena Hukum. (t.t.). https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/1774
Projecting the long‐run impact of an economic reform: The case of the Indonesian Omnibus Law Gupta 2025 Asian-Pacific Economic Literature Wiley Online Library. (t.t.). Diambil 10 Juli 2026, dari https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/apel.12428
RISK-BASED LICENSING AS LICENSING REFORM IN INDONESIA BASED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION NUMBER 5 THE YEAR 2021 | Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran. (t.t.). https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jphp/article/view/807
Rodding, B. (2017). KEPUTUSAN FIKTIF NEGATIF DAN FIKTIF POSITIF DALAM PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK. TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL, 1(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v1i1.18328
Rokhman, B., Tobirin, Rokhman, A., & Kurniasih, D. (2024). PENYELENGGARAAN PERIZINAN BERUSAHA BERBASIS RISIKO MELALUI SISTEM ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION (OSS). Journal of Social and Economics Research, 6(1), 1562–1580. https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v6i1.399
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2022). Democracy and Executive Power: Administrative Policymaking in Comparative Perspective. Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y Método, 6, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.37417/RPD/vol_6_2022_978
Simanjuntak, E. (2017). PERKARA FIKTIF POSITIF DAN PERMASALAHAN HUKUMNYA. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 6(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.379-398
Sulaiman, M. F. (2025). Modifikasi Teknis Yudisial Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif Sebagai Implikasi Berlakunya OMNIBUSLAW Cipta Kerja. Widya Yuridika, 8(1), 177–194.
Tampubolon, N. S. L., Utama, K. W., & Putrijanti, A. (2021). PENERAPAN PEMERIKSAAN FIKTIF POSITIF DALAM UPAYA MEMPEROLEH KEPASTIAN HUKUM DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA. Diponegoro Law Journal, 10(3), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2021.28243
UU No. 6 Tahun 2023. (t.t.). Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/246523/uu-no-6-tahun-2023
Wulandari, A. S. R., Habiba, H., & Rahmah, A. (2023). Pembaharuan dan Dinamika Hukum dalam Proses Perizinan Usaha di Indonesia. Gema Keadilan, 10(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2023.20070
Zahro, N. E. F., & Basri, A. H. (2023). Konsep Permohonan Keputusan Fiktif Positif Pasca Berlakunya Pasal 175 Angka 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Journal of Law and Islamic Law, 1(1), 1–23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arif Muzayin Shofwan, Mawardi Mawardi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal applies the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Under this license, others may copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, and any derivative works are distributed under the same license.
